NITISH KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 363/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

BP

CNR: BRNW010016562026

Filing Number

1493/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

363/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Nawada

Judge

3-1st Dasj

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

516

Police Station

AKBARPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITISH KUMAR

    Adv. Binay Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge at Nawada granted bail to Nitish Kumar, who had been in custody since December 17, 2025, in a case registered under Section 317(5) BNS. The court allowed the bail petition after charges were framed on March 2, 2026, following its earlier directive permitting renewal of the bail application post-charge. The petitioner was released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount, with the condition that one bailor must be a family member. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    1st Dasj

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 363/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge at Nawada granted bail to Nitish Kumar, who had been in custody since December 17, 2025, in a case registered under Section 317(5) BNS. The court allowed the bail petition after charges were framed on March 2, 2026, following its earlier directive permitting renewal of the bail application post-charge. The petitioner was released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount, with the condition that one bailor must be a family member. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case