DHAMENDRA SAO URF DHAMENDRA KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 345/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,329(3),324(4),324(5),115(2),118(1),117(2),109,103(1),61(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

BP

CNR: BRNW010015312026

Filing Number

1383/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

345/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Nawada

Judge

11-3rd Dasj

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

480

Police Station

KAWAKOL

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,329(3),324(4),324(5),115(2),118(1),117(2),109,103(1),61(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHAMENDRA SAO URF DHAMENDRA KUMAR

    Adv. SRI ROHIT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    The Bihar High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under IPC Sections 480/2025 and related provisions, finding that the applicant's plea of innocence lacked credibility given the evidence and testimony presented. The court rejected the appellant's arguments challenging the judgment of the lower court, holding that the investigation was properly conducted and the case against him was substantiated, warranting dismissal of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Dasj

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Dasj

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Dasj

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 345/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bihar High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under IPC Sections 480/2025 and related provisions, finding that the applicant's plea of innocence lacked credibility given the evidence and testimony presented. The court rejected the appellant's arguments challenging the judgment of the lower court, holding that the investigation was properly conducted and the case against him was substantiated, warranting dismissal of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case