DHAMENDRA SAO URF DHAMENDRA KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 345/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,329(3),324(4),324(5),115(2),118(1),117(2),109,103(1),61(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th March 2026.
BP
CNR: BRNW010015312026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1383/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
345/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Nawada
Judge
11-3rd DASJ
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
480
Police Station
KAWAKOL
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHAMENDRA SAO URF DHAMENDRA KUMAR
Adv. SRI ROHIT KUMAR
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 11-3rd DASJ
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Bihar High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under IPC Sections 480/2025 and related provisions, finding that the applicant's plea of innocence lacked credibility given the evidence and testimony presented. The court rejected the appellant's arguments challenging the judgment of the lower court, holding that the investigation was properly conducted and the case against him was substantiated, warranting dismissal of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bihar High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under IPC Sections 480/2025 and related provisions, finding that the applicant's plea of innocence lacked credibility given the evidence and testimony presented. The court rejected the appellant's arguments challenging the judgment of the lower court, holding that the investigation was properly conducted and the case against him was substantiated, warranting dismissal of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts