JITENDRA SAW vs STATE OF BIHAR — 344/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),87. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

BP

CNR: BRNW010015282026

Filing Number

1380/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

344/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Nawada

Judge

11-3rd Dasj

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

76

Police Station

NAWADA MUFASSIL

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),87

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JITENDRA SAW

    Adv. SURESH PRASAD1

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Additional Sessions Court, Nawada rejected the bail petition of Jitendra Saw, who is accused of eloping with a 15-year-old minor girl, committing rape, and selling her in conspiracy with others under IPC Sections 137(2) and 87 of BNS, 2023. The court found that the victim's medical examination was refused, the investigation was ongoing, and the serious nature of allegations warranted continued custody, despite the petitioner's claims of innocence and no criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Dasj

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Dasj

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 344/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Court, Nawada rejected the bail petition of Jitendra Saw, who is accused of eloping with a 15-year-old minor girl, committing rape, and selling her in conspiracy with others under IPC Sections 137(2) and 87 of BNS, 2023. The court found that the victim's medical examination was refused, the investigation was ongoing, and the serious nature of allegations warranted continued custody, despite the petitioner's claims of innocence and no criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case