SAVITRI DEVI vs STATE OF BIHAR — 342/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,329(3),324(4),115(2),117(2),109,103. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

BP

CNR: BRNW010015232026

Filing Number

1376/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

342/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Nawada

Judge

11-3rd Dasj

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

480

Police Station

KAWAKOL

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,329(3),324(4),115(2),117(2),109,103

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAVITRI DEVI

    Adv. Bhutnath nand keoliyar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Patna dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by the accused-appellant. The court upheld the lower court's order rejecting the anticipatory bail application under IPC Section 480/2025 (BNSS), finding sufficient grounds for arrest and holding that the accused had no credible alibi. The court confirmed the evidence of witness tampering and injuries inflicted on victims, warranting initiation of criminal proceedings against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Dasj

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Dasj

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Dasj

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 342/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Patna dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by the accused-appellant. The court upheld the lower court's order rejecting the anticipatory bail application under IPC Section 480/2025 (BNSS), finding sufficient grounds for arrest and holding that the accused had no credible alibi. The court confirmed the evidence of witness tampering and injuries inflicted on victims, warranting initiation of criminal proceedings against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case