HAIDER ALI vs STATE OF BIHAR — 591/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,126(2),115(2),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

ABP

CNR: BRNW010015192026

Filing Number

1372/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

591/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Nawada

Judge

12-5th Dasj

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

186

Police Station

KASHICHAK

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,126(2),115(2),352,351(2),3(5)
Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HAIDER ALI

    Adv. ANUJ KUMAR

  2. 2.REFFAT JAHAN

  3. 3.KISHWAR JAHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Haidar Ali, Kishwar Jahan, and Raufat Jahan) in a dowry harassment and domestic violence case registered under IPC Sections 85, 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) and DV Act Section 3/4. The court found the allegations of dowry demand and subsequent cruelty to be generally broad and the charges cognizable, but determined that bail was justified given the circumstances and precedents, imposing a bond of Rs. 10,000 per accused with surety, conditional on the accused's appearance before the court within 30 days or surrender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    5th Dasj

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    5th Dasj

  5. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Dasj

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Dasj

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 591/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Haidar Ali, Kishwar Jahan, and Raufat Jahan) in a dowry harassment and domestic violence case registered under IPC Sections 85, 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) and DV Act Section 3/4. The court found the allegations of dowry demand and subsequent cruelty to be generally broad and the charges cognizable, but determined that bail was justified given the circumstances and precedents, imposing a bond of Rs. 10,000 per accused with surety, conditional on the accused's appearance before the court within 30 days or surrender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case