SHASHIKANT KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 332/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1),64(2),351(2),351(3),303(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

BP

CNR: BRNW010014772026

Filing Number

1336/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

332/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Nawada

Judge

3-1st Dasj

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

237

Police Station

HISUA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1),64(2),351(2),351(3),303(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHASHIKANT KUMAR

    Adv. SRI SUNIL PANDIT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Nawada rejected Shashikant Kumar's bail petition in a rape case (Hisua P.S. Case No. 237/2025). The court found that the allegations—including forcible sexual assault, repeated coercion through threats of viral intimate content and harm to family, and unauthorized possession of the victim's mobile and ATM cards—combined with witness corroboration and the victim's statement, rendered the petitioner ineligible for bail given the grave nature of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    1st Dasj

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 332/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Nawada rejected Shashikant Kumar's bail petition in a rape case (Hisua P.S. Case No. 237/2025). The court found that the allegations—including forcible sexual assault, repeated coercion through threats of viral intimate content and harm to family, and unauthorized possession of the victim's mobile and ATM cards—combined with witness corroboration and the victim's statement, rendered the petitioner ineligible for bail given the grave nature of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case