RAMFUL YADAV URF GORE vs STATE OF BIHAR — 458/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

ABP

CNR: BRNW010012452026

Filing Number

1123/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

458/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Nawada

Judge

3-1st Dasj

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

419

Police Station

NEMDARGANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMFUL YADAV URF GORE

    Adv. Upendra kumar 1

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge rejected anticipatory bail for Ramfal Yadav @ Gore in a murder case where he allegedly abducted and killed Ravindra Yadav by striking his head with bricks and stones on 26.11.2025. The court found witness statements and post-mortem evidence sufficiently supported the charges under BNS sections 103(1)/3(5), and considering the petitioner's prior criminal record, denied him bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    1st Dasj

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  5. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  6. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  9. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 458/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge rejected anticipatory bail for Ramfal Yadav @ Gore in a murder case where he allegedly abducted and killed Ravindra Yadav by striking his head with bricks and stones on 26.11.2025. The court found witness statements and post-mortem evidence sufficiently supported the charges under BNS sections 103(1)/3(5), and considering the petitioner's prior criminal record, denied him bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case