GORELAL CHAUDHARY vs STATE OF BIHAR — 277/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),,190,126(2),115(2),118(2),109,303(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

BP

CNR: BRNW010012342026

Filing Number

1112/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

277/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Nawada

Judge

3-1st Dasj

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

231

Police Station

Kadirganj

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),,190,126(2),115(2),118(2),109,303(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GORELAL CHAUDHARY

    Adv. RAM KRISHNA CHAUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of JUDGEmentView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge at Nawada rejected Gorelal Chaudhary's bail petition filed in connection with a case involving alleged gang assault and robbery. The court found that the petitioner was named in the FIR, witnesses corroborated the incident, and victims sustained grievous injuries, making the allegations serious in nature; accordingly, bail was denied at this stage, though the petitioner may renew the application after the charge sheet is filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    1st Dasj

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  10. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 277/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge at Nawada rejected Gorelal Chaudhary's bail petition filed in connection with a case involving alleged gang assault and robbery. The court found that the petitioner was named in the FIR, witnesses corroborated the incident, and victims sustained grievous injuries, making the allegations serious in nature; accordingly, bail was denied at this stage, though the petitioner may renew the application after the charge sheet is filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case