SUMAN KUMARI vs STATE OF BIHAR — 385/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,126(2),308(3),118(1),117(2),109,324(4),324(5),352,351(1). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.
ABP
CNR: BRNW010010842026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
978/2026
Filing Date
13-02-2026
Registration No
385/2026
Registration Date
13-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Nawada
Judge
3-1st DASJ
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
357
Police Station
RAJAULI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUMAN KUMARI
Adv. AVINASH CHANDRA
PUNAM KUMARI
MANJU DEVI
RAVI RAUSHAN
MUSAFIR CHAUDHARY
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-1st DASJ
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Sajan Kumar's bail petition in a case involving alleged abduction of a 17-year-old minor girl under Section 96 B.N.S. The court found the allegations serious enough to warrant continued custody, noting that the victim's statement held no evidentiary importance given her age, and dismissed the petitioner's claims of innocence and lack of criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Sajan Kumar's bail petition in a case involving alleged abduction of a 17-year-old minor girl under Section 96 B.N.S. The court found the allegations serious enough to warrant continued custody, noting that the victim's statement held no evidentiary importance given her age, and dismissed the petitioner's claims of innocence and lack of criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts