RAJU KUMAR VERMA vs STATE OF BIHAR — 311/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

ABP

CNR: BRNW010008902026

Filing Number

812/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

311/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Nawada

Judge

3-1st Dasj

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

303

Police Station

GOBINDPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJU KUMAR VERMA

    Adv. SRI PUSHP PAWAN DIKSHIT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Raju Kumar Verma, who was accused of operating an unregistered ultrasound center and conducting illegal sex-determination tests in violation of the PNDT Act 1994. The court found the prosecution's case credible, supported by witness testimony, and determined that the petitioner's actions contributed to gender imbalance in society, warranting denial of bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    1st Dasj

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  10. 05-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 311/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Raju Kumar Verma, who was accused of operating an unregistered ultrasound center and conducting illegal sex-determination tests in violation of the PNDT Act 1994. The court found the prosecution's case credible, supported by witness testimony, and determined that the petitioner's actions contributed to gender imbalance in society, warranting denial of bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case