DILIP KUMAR URF DILIP YADAV vs STATE OF BIHAR — 235/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),329(4),76,117(2),303(2),324(4),352,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

ABP

CNR: BRNW010006712026

Filing Number

611/2026

Filing Date

27-Jan-2026

Registration No

235/2026

Registration Date

27-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Nawada

Judge

3-1st Dasj

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

261

Police Station

GOBINDPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),329(4),76,117(2),303(2),324(4),352,352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DILIP KUMAR URF DILIP YADAV

    Adv. MUNDRIKA PRASAD

  2. 2.VIMLESH KUMAR URF VIMAL KUMAR

  3. 3.SATENDRA YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Dilip Kumar, Vimlesh Kumar, and Satendra Yadav) accused of assault, property damage, and theft. The court found the injuries sustained were simple in nature and that witnesses supported the occurrence, leading to the decision to release them on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including that one bailor must be a family member. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    1st Dasj

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  9. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 235/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Dilip Kumar, Vimlesh Kumar, and Satendra Yadav) accused of assault, property damage, and theft. The court found the injuries sustained were simple in nature and that witnesses supported the occurrence, leading to the decision to release them on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions including that one bailor must be a family member. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case