DHARMENDRA KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 179/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),118,109,303(2),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

ABP

CNR: BRNW010005122026

Filing Number

468/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

179/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Nawada

Judge

3-1st Dasj

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

368

Police Station

AKBARPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),118,109,303(2),352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHARMENDRA KUMAR

    Adv. ARUN KUMAR 1

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Judge-1st, Nawada rejected Dharmendra Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving allegations of assault and rioting during a land dispute. The court found that witnesses supported the allegations against the petitioner, he had a prior criminal antecedent, and the investigation was ongoing, making him ineligible for anticipatory bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    1st Dasj

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  8. 31-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  9. 21-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  10. 20-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 179/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge-1st, Nawada rejected Dharmendra Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving allegations of assault and rioting during a land dispute. The court found that witnesses supported the allegations against the petitioner, he had a prior criminal antecedent, and the investigation was ongoing, making him ineligible for anticipatory bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case