DHIRAJ KUMAR URF DHIRAJ GOSHWAMI vs STATE OF BIHAR — 90/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 139,87. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.
ABP
CNR: BRNW010002052026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
190/2026
Filing Date
09-01-2026
Registration No
90/2026
Registration Date
09-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Nawada
Judge
3-1st DASJ
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
625
Police Station
HISUA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHIRAJ KUMAR URF DHIRAJ GOSHWAMI
Adv. Navin kumar
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-1st DASJ
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 27-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 18-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge-1st, Nawada rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Dhiraj Kumar, who was accused of abducting a 15-year-old girl on 07.11.2025 under sections 139 and 87 of the BNS. The court found that witnesses and case diary records consistently established the victim's age as 15 years, rejecting the petitioner's claim that she was a major per Aadhar Card, and concluded the gravity of the offense warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge-1st, Nawada rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Dhiraj Kumar, who was accused of abducting a 15-year-old girl on 07.11.2025 under sections 139 and 87 of the BNS. The court found that witnesses and case diary records consistently established the victim's age as 15 years, rejecting the petitioner's claim that she was a major per Aadhar Card, and concluded the gravity of the offense warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts