DHIRAJ KUMAR URF DHIRAJ GOSHWAMI vs STATE OF BIHAR — 90/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 139,87. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

ABP

CNR: BRNW010002052026

Filing Number

190/2026

Filing Date

09-Jan-2026

Registration No

90/2026

Registration Date

09-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Nawada

Judge

3-1st Dasj

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

625

Police Station

HISUA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 139,87

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHIRAJ KUMAR URF DHIRAJ GOSHWAMI

    Adv. Navin kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge-1st, Nawada rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Dhiraj Kumar, who was accused of abducting a 15-year-old girl on 07.11.2025 under sections 139 and 87 of the BNS. The court found that witnesses and case diary records consistently established the victim's age as 15 years, rejecting the petitioner's claim that she was a major per Aadhar Card, and concluded the gravity of the offense warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    1st Dasj

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  9. 07-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  10. 30-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  11. 24-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  12. 13-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  13. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 09-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 90/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge-1st, Nawada rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Dhiraj Kumar, who was accused of abducting a 15-year-old girl on 07.11.2025 under sections 139 and 87 of the BNS. The court found that witnesses and case diary records consistently established the victim's age as 15 years, rejecting the petitioner's claim that she was a major per Aadhar Card, and concluded the gravity of the offense warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case