VIJAY KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 86/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

ABP

CNR: BRNW010002012026

Filing Number

186/2026

Filing Date

09-Jan-2026

Registration No

86/2026

Registration Date

09-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Nawada

Judge

3-1st Dasj

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

303

Police Station

NARDIGANJ

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY KUMAR

    Adv. AJAY KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge, Nawada rejected Vijay Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a theft case registered under BNS sections 331(4)/305. The court found that prosecution witnesses supported the charges of nighttime theft from a dwelling house, investigation was ongoing, the offense was serious in nature, and the petitioner had a prior criminal record, making him unsuitable for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    1st Dasj

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  9. 24-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  10. 13-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  11. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 09-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 86/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge, Nawada rejected Vijay Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a theft case registered under BNS sections 331(4)/305. The court found that prosecution witnesses supported the charges of nighttime theft from a dwelling house, investigation was ongoing, the offense was serious in nature, and the petitioner had a prior criminal record, making him unsuitable for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case