State of Bihar(ST-552/ vs NAGINA PRASAD AND OTHERS — 177/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,448,308,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRNL100020062022
Filing Number
1989/2022
Filing Date
23-09-2022
Registration No
177/2022
Registration Date
23-09-2022
Court
DJ Div. Hilsa
Judge
13-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
371
Police Station
CHANDI
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Bihar(ST-552/
Respondent(s)
NAGINA PRASAD AND OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: 13-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
Disposed
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-05-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 28-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 25-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 177/2022 (State of Bihar v. Nagina Prasad and Others) The court quashed the FIR against accused Nagina Prasad, Akash Kumar, and Vikash Kumar under IPC sections 341, 323, 448, 308, 504, 506/34, finding that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence of their involvement in the alleged criminal assault. The court determined that the accused's statements during cross-examination were credible, witness accounts were inconsistent, and the police investigation was inadequate to support criminal charges, thereby granting relief to the accused under CrPC provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 177/2022 (State of Bihar v. Nagina Prasad and Others) The court quashed the FIR against accused Nagina Prasad, Akash Kumar, and Vikash Kumar under IPC sections 341, 323, 448, 308, 504, 506/34, finding that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence of their involvement in the alleged criminal assault. The court determined that the accused's statements during cross-examination were credible, witness accounts were inconsistent, and the police investigation was inadequate to support criminal charges, thereby granting relief to the accused under CrPC provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts