State of Bihar(ST-552/ vs NAGINA PRASAD AND OTHERS — 177/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,448,308,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRNL100020062022

Filing Number

1989/2022

Filing Date

23-Sep-2022

Registration No

177/2022

Registration Date

23-Sep-2022

Court

DJ Div. Hilsa

Judge

13-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

371

Police Station

CHANDI

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,448,308,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar(ST-552/

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAGINA PRASAD AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 177/2022 (State of Bihar v. Nagina Prasad and Others) The court quashed the FIR against accused Nagina Prasad, Akash Kumar, and Vikash Kumar under IPC sections 341, 323, 448, 308, 504, 506/34, finding that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence of their involvement in the alleged criminal assault. The court determined that the accused's statements during cross-examination were credible, witness accounts were inconsistent, and the police investigation was inadequate to support criminal charges, thereby granting relief to the accused under CrPC provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  4. 02-May-2026

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  9. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  10. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  11. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  12. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  13. 05-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  14. 06-May-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  15. 27-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  16. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  17. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  18. 08-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  19. 25-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  20. 20-Aug-2024

    Hearing Before Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  21. 28-Jun-2024

    Hearing Before Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  22. 06-May-2024

    Hearing Before Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  23. 11-Mar-2024

    Hearing Before Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  24. 16-Jan-2024

    Hearing Before Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  25. 23-Nov-2023

    Hearing Before Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  26. 12-Oct-2023

    Hearing Before Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  27. 19-Aug-2023

    Hearing Before Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  28. 28-Jun-2023

    Hearing Before Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  29. 27-Apr-2023

    Hearing Before Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  30. 06-Feb-2023

    Hearing Before Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  31. 30-Nov-2022

    Hearing Before Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  32. 21-Oct-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 23-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 177/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 177/2022 (State of Bihar v. Nagina Prasad and Others) The court quashed the FIR against accused Nagina Prasad, Akash Kumar, and Vikash Kumar under IPC sections 341, 323, 448, 308, 504, 506/34, finding that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence of their involvement in the alleged criminal assault. The court determined that the accused's statements during cross-examination were credible, witness accounts were inconsistent, and the police investigation was inadequate to support criminal charges, thereby granting relief to the accused under CrPC provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case