ANAND KUMAR vs State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH — 130/2026
Case under Arms Act Section 25(1B),A,26. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 29th April 2026.
Bail Petition
CNR: BRNL100005362026
Filing Number
527/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
130/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Hilsa
Judge
14-District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
281
Police Station
KARAI PARASURAI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANAND KUMAR
Adv. RAJA RAM KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
Copy of Order
Case 130/2026 Summary The court rejected Anand Kumar's bail petition filed under CrPC Sections 25(1-B)(a) and 26, finding no merit in his arguments for release. The court held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that his confinement was illegal or that prescribed bail conditions were violated, and upheld the detention order while imposing a fine of Rs. 10,000 on the petitioner for filing a frivolous application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V
-
22-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V
-
15-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V
-
13-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V
-
09-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 130/2026
Case 130/2026 Summary The court rejected Anand Kumar's bail petition filed under CrPC Sections 25(1-B)(a) and 26, finding no merit in his arguments for release. The court held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that his confinement was illegal or that prescribed bail conditions were violated, and upheld the detention order while imposing a fine of Rs. 10,000 on the petitioner for filing a frivolous application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts