VISHWAKARMA KUMAR vs State of Bihar(COMP-87C/ — 223/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRNL100005202026
Filing Number
511/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
223/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Hilsa
Judge
13-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VISHWAKARMA KUMAR
Adv. RUPESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar(COMP-87C/
-
2.Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary of Case 223/2028 The court allowed Vishwakarma Kumar's petition against the State of Bihar regarding a matrimonial dispute. The court found that the petitioner's wife had abandoned him without justification and directed the State to pay compensation of Rs. 1,000/- per month to the petitioner, with retrospective effect from the date of abandonment. The court also issued directions under Section 482(2) CrPC to ensure compliance and ordered the respondents to maintain peace while dismissing any frivolous claims against the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
17-Apr-2026
Order
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
08-Apr-2026
L.C.R
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
26-Mar-2026
L.C.R
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
18-Mar-2026
L.C.R
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
12-Mar-2026
L.C.R
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
11-Mar-2026
L.C.R
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
02-Mar-2026
L.C.R
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 223/2026
Summary of Case 223/2028 The court allowed Vishwakarma Kumar's petition against the State of Bihar regarding a matrimonial dispute. The court found that the petitioner's wife had abandoned him without justification and directed the State to pay compensation of Rs. 1,000/- per month to the petitioner, with retrospective effect from the date of abandonment. The court also issued directions under Section 482(2) CrPC to ensure compliance and ordered the respondents to maintain peace while dismissing any frivolous claims against the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts