UMASHANKAR PRASAD vs State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH — 123/2026

Case under Arms Act Section 25(1B),A,26,35. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition

CNR: BRNL100005182026

Filing Number

509/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

123/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Hilsa

Judge

2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 25(1B),A,26,35

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMASHANKAR PRASAD

    Adv. PRAVIN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

    The court dismissed the petition filed under Section 25(1-B), 26/35 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, finding that the allegations against the accused were not substantiated and that the evidence did not support the charges of wrongful confinement or criminal intimidation. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 10,000 on the accused and directed the filing of a case report with the lower court for further proceedings in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    L.C.R

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    L.C.R

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    L.C.R

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 123/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition filed under Section 25(1-B), 26/35 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, finding that the allegations against the accused were not substantiated and that the evidence did not support the charges of wrongful confinement or criminal intimidation. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 10,000 on the accused and directed the filing of a case report with the lower court for further proceedings in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case