JAUSHAN KUMAR vs State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH — 121/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 310(4),310(6),3(5),317(4). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition

CNR: BRNL100005162026

Filing Number

507/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

121/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Hilsa

Judge

2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 310(4),310(6),3(5),317(4)
Arms Act Section 25(1B),A,26,35

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAUSHAN KUMAR

    Adv. BHANU PD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the bail application (No. 121/2026) filed by Joshan Kumar, finding that the allegations against him are serious and prima facie substantiated, making bail inappropriate at this stage. The court rejected the applicant's arguments regarding lack of evidence and ruled that the accused is not entitled to bail, remanding him in judicial custody until August 31, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    L.C.R

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    L.C.R

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    L.C.R

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    L.C.R

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 121/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the bail application (No. 121/2026) filed by Joshan Kumar, finding that the allegations against him are serious and prima facie substantiated, making bail inappropriate at this stage. The court rejected the applicant's arguments regarding lack of evidence and ruled that the accused is not entitled to bail, remanding him in judicial custody until August 31, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case