HARENDRA KUMAR vs State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH — 210/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),303(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRNL100004892026
Filing Number
480/2026
Filing Date
21-02-2026
Registration No
210/2026
Registration Date
21-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Hilsa
Judge
13-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
45
Police Station
HILSA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HARENDRA KUMAR
Adv. SURYADEO KUMAR VIBHUTI
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: 13-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
Disposed
ORDER
Case diary and Injury report
Case diary and Injury report
Case diary and Injury report
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 06-04-2026 | Case diary and Injury report |
| 26-03-2026 | Case diary and Injury report |
| 19-03-2026 | Case diary and Injury report |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 210/2026 Harendra Kumar v. State of Bihar The court dismissed Harendra Kumar's petition challenging his criminal prosecution under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 352, and 3(5). The court found Kumar's petition lacked merit, holding that no jurisdictional error or illegality existed in the FIR filed on 19/01/2026. The court upheld the criminal proceedings, finding sufficient grounds for prosecution based on allegations of causing lacerated wounds and abrasions to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 210/2026 Harendra Kumar v. State of Bihar The court dismissed Harendra Kumar's petition challenging his criminal prosecution under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 352, and 3(5). The court found Kumar's petition lacked merit, holding that no jurisdictional error or illegality existed in the FIR filed on 19/01/2026. The court upheld the criminal proceedings, finding sufficient grounds for prosecution based on allegations of causing lacerated wounds and abrasions to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts