VINAY PRASAD AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH — 170/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,126(2),115(2),329(4),74,324(4),303(2),351(2). Disposed: Uncontested--dismissed as withdrawn on 19th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRNL100003632026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

357/2026

Filing Date

11-02-2026

Registration No

170/2026

Registration Date

11-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Hilsa

Judge

14-District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V

Decision Date

19th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--dismissed as withdrawn

FIR Details

FIR Number

9

Police Station

THARTHARI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,126(2),115(2),329(4),74,324(4),303(2),351(2)
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

VINAY PRASAD AND OTHERS

Adv. ANIL KUMAR

MITHLESH PRASAD

DIVESH PRASAD

SANJAY PRASAD

DEVANDRA PRASAD

AJAY PRASAD

SANJAY PRASAD

MUNNA PRASAD

RAJENDRA PRASAD

VIJAY PRASAD

SATISH PRASAD

PAPPU PRASAD

RAJESH

DHARMENDRA PRASAD

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH

Hearing History

Judge: 14-District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V

19-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

HEARING

23-02-2026

HEARING

20-02-2026

HEARING

13-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

19-03-2026
Copy of Order

The Upper Court (Nalandu, Bihar) rejected the petition filed under CrPC Section 170/2026, finding that the petitioner failed to establish grounds for relief. The court held that the application lacked merit as the petitioner could not demonstrate any illegality or procedural defect warranting intervention, and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Upper Court (Nalandu, Bihar) rejected the petition filed under CrPC Section 170/2026, finding that the petitioner failed to establish grounds for relief. The court held that the application lacked merit as the petitioner could not demonstrate any illegality or procedural defect warranting intervention, and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Hilsa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case