VINAY PRASAD AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH — 170/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,126(2),115(2),329(4),74,324(4),303(2),351(2). Disposed: Uncontested--dismissed as withdrawn on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRNL100003632026

Filing Number

357/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

170/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Hilsa

Judge

14-District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--dismissed as withdrawn

Last updated 08-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

9

Police Station

THARTHARI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,126(2),115(2),329(4),74,324(4),303(2),351(2)
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VINAY PRASAD AND OTHERS

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR

  2. 2.MITHLESH PRASAD

  3. 3.DIVESH PRASAD

  4. 4.SANJAY PRASAD

  5. 5.DEVANDRA PRASAD

  6. 6.AJAY PRASAD

  7. 7.SANJAY PRASAD

  8. 8.MUNNA PRASAD

  9. 9.RAJENDRA PRASAD

  10. 10.VIJAY PRASAD

  11. 11.SATISH PRASAD

  12. 12.PAPPU PRASAD

  13. 13.RAJESH

  14. 14.DHARMENDRA PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

    The Upper Court (Nalandu, Bihar) rejected the petition filed under CrPC Section 170/2026, finding that the petitioner failed to establish grounds for relief. The court held that the application lacked merit as the petitioner could not demonstrate any illegality or procedural defect warranting intervention, and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 170/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Upper Court (Nalandu, Bihar) rejected the petition filed under CrPC Section 170/2026, finding that the petitioner failed to establish grounds for relief. The court held that the application lacked merit as the petitioner could not demonstrate any illegality or procedural defect warranting intervention, and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case