SINKI DEVI AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH — 159/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,303(2),352(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRNL100003272026

Filing Number

322/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

159/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Hilsa

Judge

13-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 08-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

572

Police Station

ISLAMPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,303(2),352(3),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SINKI DEVI AND OTHERS

    Adv. ARBIND KUMAR

  2. 2.MANJU DEVI

  3. 3.KUNDAN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the criminal application filed by the accused, finding no merit in the petition seeking quashing of FIR charges. The court held that the allegations of criminal intimidation and physical assault are supported by sufficient evidence, including eyewitness accounts and medical reports documenting injuries, thereby warranting continuation of proceedings under IPC sections 482(2) and relevant criminal provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Case diary and Injury report

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case diary and Injury report

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case diary and Injury report

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 159/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the criminal application filed by the accused, finding no merit in the petition seeking quashing of FIR charges. The court held that the allegations of criminal intimidation and physical assault are supported by sufficient evidence, including eyewitness accounts and medical reports documenting injuries, thereby warranting continuation of proceedings under IPC sections 482(2) and relevant criminal provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case