SAKALDIP PASWAN AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH — 157/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),303(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRNL100003252026
Filing Number
320/2026
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
157/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Hilsa
Judge
13-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
45
Police Station
HILSA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAKALDIP PASWAN AND OTHERS
Adv. SURYADEO KUMAR VIBHUTI
-
2.PREM KUMAR
-
3.SATY KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Copy of Order
The court rejected the petition filed by Sakaldip Paswan and others against the State of Bihar, finding no merit in their claims of illegal arrest and wrongful detention. The court held that the petitioners failed to demonstrate any violation of their rights and dismissed the application, upholding the lawful actions taken by police authorities in accordance with prescribed procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
15-Apr-2026
Order
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
26-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 157/2026
The court rejected the petition filed by Sakaldip Paswan and others against the State of Bihar, finding no merit in their claims of illegal arrest and wrongful detention. The court held that the petitioners failed to demonstrate any violation of their rights and dismissed the application, upholding the lawful actions taken by police authorities in accordance with prescribed procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts