CHHOTU KUMAR vs State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH — 155/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRNL100003142026

Filing Number

309/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

155/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Hilsa

Judge

2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHHOTU KUMAR

    Adv. ANIL DEO KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

    Summary The court dismissed the bail application (SR-155/2026) of accused Chhote Kumar, finding that the allegations against him under BNS Section 103(1), 3(5) are serious and prima facie case is established. The court rejected the arguments that the accused had no prior criminal history or that the allegation was baseless, holding that the submission on bail cannot be accepted and the application is therefore rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Order

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Order

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Order

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  7. 28-Feb-2026

    L.C.R

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    L.C.R

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 155/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed the bail application (SR-155/2026) of accused Chhote Kumar, finding that the allegations against him under BNS Section 103(1), 3(5) are serious and prima facie case is established. The court rejected the arguments that the accused had no prior criminal history or that the allegation was baseless, holding that the submission on bail cannot be accepted and the application is therefore rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case