SURAJ KUMAR vs State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH — 146/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),190(1),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 13th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRNL100002702026
Filing Number
265/2026
Filing Date
05-02-2026
Registration No
146/2026
Registration Date
05-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Hilsa
Judge
13-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
1
Police Station
TELHARA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SURAJ KUMAR
Adv. UDAY KUMAR SINHA
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: 13-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-III
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 27-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 146/2026 The court rejected Suraj Kumar's petition challenging a criminal case filed against him under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 103(1), 3(5), finding the FIR was properly registered and the allegations sufficiently substantiated. The court observed that while the petitioner claimed to be acting in self-defense regarding an alleged temporal bone fracture incident, medical evidence and witness accounts supported the prosecution's version. Consequently, the petition to quash the FIR was dismissed, and the case was directed to proceed through normal judicial channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 146/2026 The court rejected Suraj Kumar's petition challenging a criminal case filed against him under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 103(1), 3(5), finding the FIR was properly registered and the allegations sufficiently substantiated. The court observed that while the petitioner claimed to be acting in self-defense regarding an alleged temporal bone fracture incident, medical evidence and witness accounts supported the prosecution's version. Consequently, the petition to quash the FIR was dismissed, and the case was directed to proceed through normal judicial channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts