INDAL PASWAN AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH — 138/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(1),324(2),351,303(2),308(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRNL100002562026
Filing Number
251/2026
Filing Date
03-Feb-2026
Registration No
138/2026
Registration Date
03-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Hilsa
Judge
14-District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.INDAL PASWAN AND OTHERS
Adv. SARBJEET KUMAR
-
2.SUMIT PASWAN
-
3.ASHOK PASWAN
-
4.VIJAY PASWAN
-
5.RAUSHAN PASWAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - RAJARAM SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Copy of Order
Summary: The Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Hilsa (Nalanda) granted anticipatory bail to five applicants (Indal Paswan, Sumit Paswan, Ashok Paswan, Vijay Paswan, and Raushan Paswan) in a case involving alleged theft of paddy crops and extortion. The court found no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and noted that most charges were bailable; the applicants were ordered to furnish a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount under Section 482(2) B.N.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V
-
11-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V
-
09-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl.Sessions Judge-V
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 138/2026
Summary: The Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Hilsa (Nalanda) granted anticipatory bail to five applicants (Indal Paswan, Sumit Paswan, Ashok Paswan, Vijay Paswan, and Raushan Paswan) in a case involving alleged theft of paddy crops and extortion. The court found no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and noted that most charges were bailable; the applicants were ordered to furnish a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount under Section 482(2) B.N.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts