Piyush Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 2354/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 96. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRNL010087262025
Filing Number
7700/2025
Filing Date
20-12-2025
Registration No
2354/2025
Registration Date
20-12-2025
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
SARMERA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Piyush Kumar
Adv. SAURABH MISHRA
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 2354/2025 Summary The Court of Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Piyush Kumar in a case registered under Section 96 BNS (alleged enticement of a minor). The court found that the victim, Rajnandani Kumar, was 18 years old, voluntarily left her home, married the petitioner in a temple, and stated this in her recorded statement, with no medical examination conducted. Piyush Kumar was admitted to anticipatory bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each, subject to standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 2354/2025 Summary The Court of Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Piyush Kumar in a case registered under Section 96 BNS (alleged enticement of a minor). The court found that the victim, Rajnandani Kumar, was 18 years old, voluntarily left her home, married the petitioner in a temple, and stated this in her recorded statement, with no medical examination conducted. Piyush Kumar was admitted to anticipatory bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each, subject to standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts