Piyush Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 2354/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 96. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRNL010087262025

Case disposed

Filing Number

7700/2025

Filing Date

20-12-2025

Registration No

2354/2025

Registration Date

20-12-2025

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

21

Police Station

SARMERA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 96

Petitioner(s)

Piyush Kumar

Adv. SAURABH MISHRA

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

15-04-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

HEARING

12-03-2026

HEARING

23-02-2026

HEARING

13-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

15-04-2026
Order

Case 2354/2025 Summary The Court of Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Piyush Kumar in a case registered under Section 96 BNS (alleged enticement of a minor). The court found that the victim, Rajnandani Kumar, was 18 years old, voluntarily left her home, married the petitioner in a temple, and stated this in her recorded statement, with no medical examination conducted. Piyush Kumar was admitted to anticipatory bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each, subject to standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 2354/2025 Summary The Court of Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Piyush Kumar in a case registered under Section 96 BNS (alleged enticement of a minor). The court found that the victim, Rajnandani Kumar, was 18 years old, voluntarily left her home, married the petitioner in a temple, and stated this in her recorded statement, with no medical examination conducted. Piyush Kumar was admitted to anticipatory bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each, subject to standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Nalanda DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case