Shiva Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 2271/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),96. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 06th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRNL010084662025
Filing Number
7490/2025
Filing Date
08-Dec-2025
Registration No
2271/2025
Registration Date
08-Dec-2025
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shiva Kumar
Adv. KAMLESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Shiva Kumar in a case involving charges under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged abduction and forced sexual relations with a minor girl (approximately 16 years old). The court found credible evidence through witness statements and the victim's detailed account that the accused forcibly took the minor with him to multiple states (Bihar, Delhi, Haryana), establishing serious charges of heinous nature, making him ineligible for bail at this investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
30-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
17-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
09-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
22-Dec-2025
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
11-Dec-2025
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
09-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2271/2025
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Shiva Kumar in a case involving charges under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged abduction and forced sexual relations with a minor girl (approximately 16 years old). The court found credible evidence through witness statements and the victim's detailed account that the accused forcibly took the minor with him to multiple states (Bihar, Delhi, Haryana), establishing serious charges of heinous nature, making him ineligible for bail at this investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts