Rajesh Kumar Verma vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 121/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th March 2026.
CRI. REVISION
CNR: BRNL010060792025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5395/2025
Filing Date
20-08-2025
Registration No
121/2025
Registration Date
20-08-2025
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1077
Police Station
Official Complaint
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajesh Kumar Verma
Adv. SANJAY KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Paramveer Raushan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Disposed
Admission
Admission
Admission
Admission
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 28-02-2026 | Admission | |
| 23-02-2026 | Admission | |
| 20-01-2026 | Admission | |
| 16-12-2025 | Admission |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge dismissed Rajesh Kr. Verma's revision petition challenging the lower court's order summoning him to trial for dishonored cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that at the pre-summoning stage, only prima facie evidence need be established, and disputes about repayment of the Rs. 11,00,000 loan through bank statements are matters for trial, not for determination at this stage. The lower court's order was affirmed as it complied with all legal requirements, including issuance of legal notice within the statutory period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge dismissed Rajesh Kr. Verma's revision petition challenging the lower court's order summoning him to trial for dishonored cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that at the pre-summoning stage, only prima facie evidence need be established, and disputes about repayment of the Rs. 11,00,000 loan through bank statements are matters for trial, not for determination at this stage. The lower court's order was affirmed as it complied with all legal requirements, including issuance of legal notice within the statutory period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts