Rajesh Kumar Verma vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 121/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th March 2026.

CRI. REVISION

CNR: BRNL010060792025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

5395/2025

Filing Date

20-08-2025

Registration No

121/2025

Registration Date

20-08-2025

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

1077

Police Station

Official Complaint

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instrument Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Rajesh Kumar Verma

Adv. SANJAY KUMAR

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Paramveer Raushan

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

10-03-2026

Disposed

28-02-2026

Admission

23-02-2026

Admission

20-01-2026

Admission

16-12-2025

Admission

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order

Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge dismissed Rajesh Kr. Verma's revision petition challenging the lower court's order summoning him to trial for dishonored cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that at the pre-summoning stage, only prima facie evidence need be established, and disputes about repayment of the Rs. 11,00,000 loan through bank statements are matters for trial, not for determination at this stage. The lower court's order was affirmed as it complied with all legal requirements, including issuance of legal notice within the statutory period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge dismissed Rajesh Kr. Verma's revision petition challenging the lower court's order summoning him to trial for dishonored cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that at the pre-summoning stage, only prima facie evidence need be established, and disputes about repayment of the Rs. 11,00,000 loan through bank statements are matters for trial, not for determination at this stage. The lower court's order was affirmed as it complied with all legal requirements, including issuance of legal notice within the statutory period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Nalanda DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case