Ramkrit Upadhyay vs Jai Prakash Upadhyay — 148/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 18th April 2026.
Civil Misc. Transfer
CNR: BRNL010059572025
Filing Number
660/2025
Filing Date
18-Aug-2025
Registration No
148/2025
Registration Date
18-Aug-2025
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramkrit Upadhyay
Adv. DEEPAK KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jai Prakash Upadhyay
-
2.Shankar Kumar Upadhyay
-
3.Sahil Kumar Upadhyay
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Order
Summary The court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of Miscellaneous Case No. 1006/2017 as infructuous, since the Court of Learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division) VII, Biharsharif, Nalanda—which was previously vacant—has now become functional with a judge already joined. The petition had become moot and without purpose given the changed circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Report
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Report
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Report
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Jan-2026
Report
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Oct-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Sep-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 148/2025
Summary The court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of Miscellaneous Case No. 1006/2017 as infructuous, since the Court of Learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division) VII, Biharsharif, Nalanda—which was previously vacant—has now become functional with a judge already joined. The petition had become moot and without purpose given the changed circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts