Sulendar Yadav Alias Surendra vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 70/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th March 2026.
CRI. REVISION
CNR: BRNL010037182025
Filing Number
3359/2025
Filing Date
21-May-2025
Registration No
70/2025
Registration Date
21-May-2025
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sulendar Yadav Alias Surendra
Adv. ASHOK PRASAD SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
Order
The court dismissed the revision petition and upheld the proclamation order issued under Section 82 Cr.P.C. against the accused for offenses under Sections 406 and 420 IPC (criminal breach of trust and cheating). The court found that the lower court properly complied with legal procedures, as the accused deliberately avoided cooperation with the investigation despite multiple attempts, failed to respond to notices, and warrant execution reports were on record, justifying his declaration as a proclaimed offender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
07-Feb-2026
Admission
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
19-Jan-2026
Admission
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
24-Dec-2025
Admission
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
26-Nov-2025
Admission
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Admission
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Admission
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Sep-2025
Admission
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Aug-2025
Admission
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Jul-2025
Admission
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
22-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 70/2025
The court dismissed the revision petition and upheld the proclamation order issued under Section 82 Cr.P.C. against the accused for offenses under Sections 406 and 420 IPC (criminal breach of trust and cheating). The court found that the lower court properly complied with legal procedures, as the accused deliberately avoided cooperation with the investigation despite multiple attempts, failed to respond to notices, and warrant execution reports were on record, justifying his declaration as a proclaimed offender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts