Gautam Kumar Alias Gautam Manjhi vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 362/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRNL010016332026

Filing Number

1421/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

362/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

195

Police Station

SARMERA

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 302,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gautam Kumar Alias Gautam Manjhi

    Adv. Ranjay Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 362/2026 The court granted bail to petitioner Gautam Kumar alias Gautam Manjhi, accused under IPC Section 302/34 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) in connection with the death of Ram Vilas Paswan on July 28, 2020. The court found that charges against the petitioner were general in nature with weak evidentiary support, and critically, three co-accused were already granted bail by the High Court, making the petitioner eligible for bail on grounds of parity. Bail was fixed at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equivalent value. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 362/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 362/2026 The court granted bail to petitioner Gautam Kumar alias Gautam Manjhi, accused under IPC Section 302/34 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) in connection with the death of Ram Vilas Paswan on July 28, 2020. The court found that charges against the petitioner were general in nature with weak evidentiary support, and critically, three co-accused were already granted bail by the High Court, making the petitioner eligible for bail on grounds of parity. Bail was fixed at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equivalent value. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case