Munna Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 509/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRNL010014492026

Filing Number

1261/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

509/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

130

Police Station

Bihar Sharif

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109(1),352,3(5)
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Munna Kumar

    Adv. KAMLESH KUMAR

  2. 2.Doman Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to Munna Kumar and Doman Yadav in a firearms case, finding that no party suffered injuries and the recovery location of bullets was significantly distant from the incident site, creating credibility gaps in the prosecution's case. The petitioners were released on bail of ₹10,000 each with two sureties, on conditions including full cooperation with police investigation, weekly police station reporting, and abstention from criminal activity during the bail period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 509/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to Munna Kumar and Doman Yadav in a firearms case, finding that no party suffered injuries and the recovery location of bullets was significantly distant from the incident site, creating credibility gaps in the prosecution's case. The petitioners were released on bail of ₹10,000 each with two sureties, on conditions including full cooperation with police investigation, weekly police station reporting, and abstention from criminal activity during the bail period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case