Md.Imran Khan vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 503/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1),126(2),115(2),352,351(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRNL010014382026
Filing Number
1252/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
503/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
Mahila PS Biharsharif
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Md.Imran Khan
Adv. Shailendra Kumar Savita
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 503/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected Md. Imran Khan's bail application under BNS sections 64(1), 126(2), 115(2), 352, and 351(1). Key Reasoning: The court found that Imran Khan is accused of serious sexual offenses involving blackmail through intimate photographs/videos of a woman victim. The case involves grave charges supported by digital evidence, the accused has a prior criminal history, and investigation remains ongoing. Given the severity of the offenses and investigative stage, granting interim bail was deemed inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
26-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 503/2026
Case Summary: 503/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected Md. Imran Khan's bail application under BNS sections 64(1), 126(2), 115(2), 352, and 351(1). Key Reasoning: The court found that Imran Khan is accused of serious sexual offenses involving blackmail through intimate photographs/videos of a woman victim. The case involves grave charges supported by digital evidence, the accused has a prior criminal history, and investigation remains ongoing. Given the severity of the offenses and investigative stage, granting interim bail was deemed inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts