Ajay Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 310/2026
Case under Indian Electricity Act Section 136. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRNL010014262026
Filing Number
1240/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
310/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
90
Police Station
TELMAR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ajay Kumar
Adv. Shailendra Kumar Savita
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 310/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge granted regular bail to Ajay Kumar, accused under Section 136 of the Indian Electricity Act for alleged theft of LT cables worth approximately Rs. 5.85 lakhs. The court found that Kumar was not named in the FIR and was implicated solely based on a co-accused's confessional statement, with no incriminating material recovered from his possession. He was released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, on conditions that he remain present at all hearings until charge framing and not commit similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 310/2026
Case Summary: 310/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge granted regular bail to Ajay Kumar, accused under Section 136 of the Indian Electricity Act for alleged theft of LT cables worth approximately Rs. 5.85 lakhs. The court found that Kumar was not named in the FIR and was implicated solely based on a co-accused's confessional statement, with no incriminating material recovered from his possession. He was released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, on conditions that he remain present at all hearings until charge framing and not commit similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts