Soni Khatoon vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 485/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),127(2),115(2),109,191(2),191(3),352,351(2),324(4),103,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRNL010013902026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1211/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

485/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

560

Police Station

HARNAUT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),127(2),115(2),109,191(2),191(3),352,351(2),324(4),103,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Soni Khatoon

Adv. ASIF RAZA

Shajmin Khatoon

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

17-04-2026

Disposed

09-04-2026

HEARING

28-03-2026

HEARING

19-03-2026

HEARING

12-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

17-04-2026
Order

Case Summary The court granted bail to Soni Khatun and Sajmin Khatun in an FIR registered under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act involving charges of rioting and causing grievous hurt. While the prosecution alleged the accused conspired with others to assault victims following an altercation, the court found the accused had no criminal history, no previous bail applications, and agreed to surrender within 30 days, warranting bail on condition of executing a bond with two sureties and complying with specified conditions including cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court granted bail to Soni Khatun and Sajmin Khatun in an FIR registered under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act involving charges of rioting and causing grievous hurt. While the prosecution alleged the accused conspired with others to assault victims following an altercation, the court found the accused had no criminal history, no previous bail applications, and agreed to surrender within 30 days, warranting bail on condition of executing a bond with two sureties and complying with specified conditions including cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Nalanda DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case