Soni Khatoon vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 485/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),127(2),115(2),109,191(2),191(3),352,351(2),324(4),103,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRNL010013902026
Filing Number
1211/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
485/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 08-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
560
Police Station
HARNAUT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Soni Khatoon
Adv. ASIF RAZA
-
2.Shajmin Khatoon
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary The court granted bail to Soni Khatun and Sajmin Khatun in an FIR registered under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act involving charges of rioting and causing grievous hurt. While the prosecution alleged the accused conspired with others to assault victims following an altercation, the court found the accused had no criminal history, no previous bail applications, and agreed to surrender within 30 days, warranting bail on condition of executing a bond with two sureties and complying with specified conditions including cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI
-
09-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 485/2026
Case Summary The court granted bail to Soni Khatun and Sajmin Khatun in an FIR registered under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act involving charges of rioting and causing grievous hurt. While the prosecution alleged the accused conspired with others to assault victims following an altercation, the court found the accused had no criminal history, no previous bail applications, and agreed to surrender within 30 days, warranting bail on condition of executing a bond with two sureties and complying with specified conditions including cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts