Ravi Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 21/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397,399,401. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NON-MAINTAINABLE on 10th March 2026.

CRI. REVISION

CNR: BRNL010013812026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1203/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

21/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NON-MAINTAINABLE

FIR Details

FIR Number

107

Police Station

Official Complaint

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code Section 397,399,401

Petitioner(s)

Ravi Kumar

Adv. ASHRAF YUSUF KHAN

Birendra Kumar alias Birendra Prasad

Ruby Kumari Ruby Devi

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Khushbu Kumari

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

10-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order

The Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Nalanda dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Ravi Kumar and others at the admission stage itself, holding that the revision was barred by law of limitation as it was filed with a delay of 126 days without satisfactory explanation. The court found that while limitation provisions may be applied with some latitude in criminal matters, the petitioners failed to provide any bona fide or convincing reason for the delay, making the application for condonation of delay liable to rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Nalanda dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Ravi Kumar and others at the admission stage itself, holding that the revision was barred by law of limitation as it was filed with a delay of 126 days without satisfactory explanation. The court found that while limitation provisions may be applied with some latitude in criminal matters, the petitioners failed to provide any bona fide or convincing reason for the delay, making the application for condonation of delay liable to rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Nalanda DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case