Anuj Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 478/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),127(2),118(2),109,351(2),190,61(2),191(2),352. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRNL010013732026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1196/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
478/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
668
Police Station
NOORSARAI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anuj Kumar
Adv. KAMLESH KUMAR
Rahul Kumar
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 21-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 16-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 13-04-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Court of Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Anuj Kumar and Rahul Kumar in a case involving alleged assault with weapons. The court found no specific allegations against the petitioners, noted the injuries were simple in nature, and observed that co-accused persons had already received bail, along with evidence of previous land disputes and counter-cases between the parties. The petitioners were admitted to anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Court of Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Anuj Kumar and Rahul Kumar in a case involving alleged assault with weapons. The court found no specific allegations against the petitioners, noted the injuries were simple in nature, and observed that co-accused persons had already received bail, along with evidence of previous land disputes and counter-cases between the parties. The petitioners were admitted to anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts