Ravi Kumar Verma vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 284/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305(A),3(5),317(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRNL010012892026

Filing Number

1120/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

284/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

33

Police Station

Bihar Sharif

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305(A),3(5),317(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ravi Kumar Verma

    Adv. SANJAY KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Court of Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Ravi Kumar Verma in a case involving alleged purchase of stolen gold ornaments worth Rs. 7 lakhs. The court found insufficient material evidence against the petitioner—no recovery from his possession, no confessional statement, and only allegations based on co-accused's statement—and considered his prolonged custody (over two months) and lack of criminal antecedents. Bail was allowed on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 284/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Ravi Kumar Verma in a case involving alleged purchase of stolen gold ornaments worth Rs. 7 lakhs. The court found insufficient material evidence against the petitioner—no recovery from his possession, no confessional statement, and only allegations based on co-accused's statement—and considered his prolonged custody (over two months) and lack of criminal antecedents. Bail was allowed on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case