Dr. Varun kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 445/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,115(2),132,223(b),109+,352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRNL010012702026

Filing Number

1104/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

445/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,115(2),132,223(b),109+,352,351(2)
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(va)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dr. Varun kumar

    Adv. BIRENDRA KUMAR

  2. 2.Dr.Arun Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the interim bail application of Dr. Varun Kumar and Dr. Arun Kumar Singh, who were accused under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a police informant and constable on March 4-5, 2025. The court found sufficient evidence through witness testimonies and CCTV footage confirming the applicants' involvement in the assault, making them ineligible for interim bail under the applicable statutory provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 445/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the interim bail application of Dr. Varun Kumar and Dr. Arun Kumar Singh, who were accused under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting a police informant and constable on March 4-5, 2025. The court found sufficient evidence through witness testimonies and CCTV footage confirming the applicants' involvement in the assault, making them ineligible for interim bail under the applicable statutory provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case