Ranveer Kumar Alias Gore vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 266/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317(4),317(5),310(4),310(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRNL010012352026

Filing Number

1072/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

266/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317(4),317(5),310(4),310(5)
Arms Act Section 25(1-b)a,26,35

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ranveer Kumar Alias Gore

    Adv. SHYAMSUNDER PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The District and Sessions Court in Nalanda, Bihar granted bail to the accused Raphir Kumar Urf Gorse in a case involving organized wire theft and robbery (FIR No. 576/2025 under IPC Sections 317, 310, and Arms Act Sections 25, 26, 35). The court found that no stolen material was recovered from the applicant, and several co-accused had previously been granted bail by the same court with no criminal history, justifying the bail grant on a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 266/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District and Sessions Court in Nalanda, Bihar granted bail to the accused Raphir Kumar Urf Gorse in a case involving organized wire theft and robbery (FIR No. 576/2025 under IPC Sections 317, 310, and Arms Act Sections 25, 26, 35). The court found that no stolen material was recovered from the applicant, and several co-accused had previously been granted bail by the same court with no criminal history, justifying the bail grant on a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case