Raju Kumar Alias Chotu vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 258/2026

Case under Immoral Traffic Act Section 3,4,5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRNL010012082026

Filing Number

1051/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

258/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Immoral Traffic Act Section 3,4,5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Raju Kumar Alias Chotu

    Adv. SUMANT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to Raju Kumar Urf Chotu in a case under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. The court found no specific charges against the applicant, who was merely present at the location, and held that the charges did not appear substantiated on prima facie grounds. Bail was granted on a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with the condition that one surety be a close relative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 258/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to Raju Kumar Urf Chotu in a case under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. The court found no specific charges against the applicant, who was merely present at the location, and held that the charges did not appear substantiated on prima facie grounds. Bail was granted on a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with the condition that one surety be a close relative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case