Rakesh Kumar Verma vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 256/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,376,504,506/34. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRNL010011962026

Filing Number

1042/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

256/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 08-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

559

Police Station

Bihar Sharif

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 376,376,504,506/34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rakesh Kumar Verma

    Adv. JITENDRA KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court rejected Rakesh Kumar Verma's bail application in a case involving serious charges including rape, theft, cheating, and criminal intimidation. The court found the allegations grave, noting a pattern of repeated deception and exploitation—including fraudulent promise of marriage, misappropriation of the victim's jewelry, and use of obscene photographs and threatening messages via digital media to intimidate the victim and her family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  6. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 256/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected Rakesh Kumar Verma's bail application in a case involving serious charges including rape, theft, cheating, and criminal intimidation. The court found the allegations grave, noting a pattern of repeated deception and exploitation—including fraudulent promise of marriage, misappropriation of the victim's jewelry, and use of obscene photographs and threatening messages via digital media to intimidate the victim and her family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case