Vijay Yadav Alias Bijo Yadav vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 253/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317(2),309(4). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRNL010011892026
Filing Number
1035/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
253/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 08-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
263
Police Station
GIRIAK
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vijay Yadav Alias Bijo Yadav
Adv. Kamesh Prasad
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
The court granted bail to accused Vijay Yadav on a regular bail petition under sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the BNS, setting bail amount at ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal value. The court found that while the accused had been in judicial custody since February 5, 2026 (approximately eight months), no theft charge was formally lodged against him, and the case was based on suspicion rather than substantive evidence, warranting his interim release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 253/2026
The court granted bail to accused Vijay Yadav on a regular bail petition under sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the BNS, setting bail amount at ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal value. The court found that while the accused had been in judicial custody since February 5, 2026 (approximately eight months), no theft charge was formally lodged against him, and the case was based on suspicion rather than substantive evidence, warranting his interim release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts