Guddu Jamadar Alias Guddu Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 252/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,379,504,506,498(A)/34. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRNL010011862026

Filing Number

1032/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

252/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 08-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

33

Police Station

CHHABILAPUR

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,379,504,506,498(A)/34
Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Guddu Jamadar Alias Guddu Kumar

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the regular bail petition of Guddu Jamadar, who was accused of dowry-related offenses and domestic violence against his wife. The court found that the petitioner violated the maintenance payment conditions imposed by the Patna High Court in his earlier anticipatory bail order by failing to pay Rs. 3,000 monthly for ten months despite his undertaking to do so, demonstrating non-compliance with court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 252/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the regular bail petition of Guddu Jamadar, who was accused of dowry-related offenses and domestic violence against his wife. The court found that the petitioner violated the maintenance payment conditions imposed by the Patna High Court in his earlier anticipatory bail order by failing to pay Rs. 3,000 monthly for ten months despite his undertaking to do so, demonstrating non-compliance with court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case