Mutaru Alias Manjeet Alias Rohit Kumar Alias Rohit Raj vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 250/2026

Case under Arms Act Section 25(1-b)a,26. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRNL010011582026

Filing Number

1009/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

250/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 25(1-b)a,26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mutaru Alias Manjeet Alias Rohit Kumar Alias Rohit Raj

    Adv. KUMAR NAGENDRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to the accused Murtaza Manjit Urf Rohit Kumar under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, directing him to furnish a bond of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties and comply with conditions including cooperation in the investigation and court proceedings. The court found that despite three pending cases against the accused (two under Excise Act and one for assault), bail was appropriate given the circumstances and the accused's custody since January 12, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 250/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to the accused Murtaza Manjit Urf Rohit Kumar under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, directing him to furnish a bond of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties and comply with conditions including cooperation in the investigation and court proceedings. The court found that despite three pending cases against the accused (two under Excise Act and one for assault), bail was appropriate given the circumstances and the accused's custody since January 12, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case