Hare Krishna Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 248/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),336(3),338,340(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRNL010011542026

Filing Number

1005/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

248/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 08-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

77

Police Station

GIRIAK

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),336(3),338,340(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hare Krishna Kumar

    Adv. SHYAMSUNDER PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Hare Krishna Kumar, who was arrested for appearing in a CTET examination in place of another candidate (his brother). The court allowed the bail petition considering the petitioner's one-month custody, absence of criminal antecedents, and nature of the offense, requiring a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 248/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Hare Krishna Kumar, who was arrested for appearing in a CTET examination in place of another candidate (his brother). The court allowed the bail petition considering the petitioner's one-month custody, absence of criminal antecedents, and nature of the offense, requiring a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case