Mohan Chaudhary vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 244/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 02nd April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRNL010011372026
Filing Number
993/2026
Filing Date
21-Feb-2026
Registration No
244/2026
Registration Date
21-Feb-2026
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 08-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
185
Police Station
SARE
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mohan Chaudhary
Adv. SONU KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
DECISION SUMMARY: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Mohan Chaudhary, accused of murdering his wife Rinki Kumari through strangulation for dowry demand of Rs. 1 lakh. The court found the allegations serious—including the unnatural death by strangulation within seven years of marriage and postmortem confirmation of asphyxia—making continued judicial custody appropriate despite the petitioner's claim of innocence and mental illness defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 244/2026
DECISION SUMMARY: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Mohan Chaudhary, accused of murdering his wife Rinki Kumari through strangulation for dowry demand of Rs. 1 lakh. The court found the allegations serious—including the unnatural death by strangulation within seven years of marriage and postmortem confirmation of asphyxia—making continued judicial custody appropriate despite the petitioner's claim of innocence and mental illness defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts