Sunny Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 243/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),338,336(3),340(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 19th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRNL010011362026
Filing Number
992/2026
Filing Date
21-02-2026
Registration No
243/2026
Registration Date
21-02-2026
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
86
Police Station
RAJGIR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunny Kumar
Adv. KAMLESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
In Case 243/2026, the court rejected the bail application of Sunny Kumar, who was accused of impersonating another candidate (Roop Kumar) during a CTET examination held on 07-02-2026. The accused allegedly took the exam using someone else's roll number and admitted to accepting ₹5,000 for this fraudulent act. The court found the charges serious and the evidence (including biometric records and witness statements) supporting the prosecution's case, determining that bail was inappropriate given the gravity of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In Case 243/2026, the court rejected the bail application of Sunny Kumar, who was accused of impersonating another candidate (Roop Kumar) during a CTET examination held on 07-02-2026. The accused allegedly took the exam using someone else's roll number and admitted to accepting ₹5,000 for this fraudulent act. The court found the charges serious and the evidence (including biometric records and witness statements) supporting the prosecution's case, determining that bail was inappropriate given the gravity of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts