Sunny Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 243/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),338,336(3),340(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRNL010011362026

Filing Number

992/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

243/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

RAJGIR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),338,336(3),340(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sunny Kumar

    Adv. KAMLESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Order

    In Case 243/2026, the court rejected the bail application of Sunny Kumar, who was accused of impersonating another candidate (Roop Kumar) during a CTET examination held on 07-02-2026. The accused allegedly took the exam using someone else's roll number and admitted to accepting ₹5,000 for this fraudulent act. The court found the charges serious and the evidence (including biometric records and witness statements) supporting the prosecution's case, determining that bail was inappropriate given the gravity of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 243/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In Case 243/2026, the court rejected the bail application of Sunny Kumar, who was accused of impersonating another candidate (Roop Kumar) during a CTET examination held on 07-02-2026. The accused allegedly took the exam using someone else's roll number and admitted to accepting ₹5,000 for this fraudulent act. The court found the charges serious and the evidence (including biometric records and witness statements) supporting the prosecution's case, determining that bail was inappropriate given the gravity of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case