Ram Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 388/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 78,79. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRNL010011142026

Filing Number

974/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

388/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 08-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

236

Police Station

BIND

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 78,79
I.t. Act 2000 Section 67,67(A),66(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ram Kumar

    Adv. ARVIND KUMAR

  2. 2.Shyam Kumar

  3. 3.Arun Bind Alias Arun Jamadar

  4. 4.Saroj Devi

  5. 5.Chanchala Devi Alias Archana Kumari

  6. 6.Shiv Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of six accused persons (Ram Kumar, Shyam Kumar, Arun Binod, Saroj Devi, Chanchal Devi, and Shiv Kumar) who were charged under IPC Sections 78, 79 and IT Act Sections 67, 67(A), 66(E) for photographing and uploading obscene images of a woman and her daughter on social media platforms without consent. The court found the accusations serious and the evidence sufficient, deeming it inappropriate to grant bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 388/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of six accused persons (Ram Kumar, Shyam Kumar, Arun Binod, Saroj Devi, Chanchal Devi, and Shiv Kumar) who were charged under IPC Sections 78, 79 and IT Act Sections 67, 67(A), 66(E) for photographing and uploading obscene images of a woman and her daughter on social media platforms without consent. The court found the accusations serious and the evidence sufficient, deeming it inappropriate to grant bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case