Ram Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 388/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 78,79. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 19th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRNL010011142026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

974/2026

Filing Date

20-02-2026

Registration No

388/2026

Registration Date

20-02-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

Decision Date

19th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

236

Police Station

BIND

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 78,79
I.T. Act 2000 Section 67,67(A),66(E)

Petitioner(s)

Ram Kumar

Adv. ARVIND KUMAR

Shyam Kumar

Arun Bind Alias Arun Jamadar

Saroj Devi

Chanchala Devi Alias Archana Kumari

Shiv Kumar

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

19-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

HEARING

24-02-2026

HEARING

21-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

19-03-2026
Order

The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of six accused persons (Ram Kumar, Shyam Kumar, Arun Binod, Saroj Devi, Chanchal Devi, and Shiv Kumar) who were charged under IPC Sections 78, 79 and IT Act Sections 67, 67(A), 66(E) for photographing and uploading obscene images of a woman and her daughter on social media platforms without consent. The court found the accusations serious and the evidence sufficient, deeming it inappropriate to grant bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of six accused persons (Ram Kumar, Shyam Kumar, Arun Binod, Saroj Devi, Chanchal Devi, and Shiv Kumar) who were charged under IPC Sections 78, 79 and IT Act Sections 67, 67(A), 66(E) for photographing and uploading obscene images of a woman and her daughter on social media platforms without consent. The court found the accusations serious and the evidence sufficient, deeming it inappropriate to grant bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Nalanda DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case